Loading...
Loading...
Regulations decoded. Compliance simplified.
A citizen petition seeks partial 510(k) exemptions for updates to cleared radiology AI, prioritizing post-market surveillance as SaMD use expands.
Why it matters: ML engineers at medtech firms can iterate cleared SaMD models faster using streamlined updates instead of repeated 510(k) submissions, if prior clearance and approved post-market plans are in place.
DoD moves to override Anthropic's restrictions on autonomous weapons and surveillance, stalling a $200M prototype AI agreement awarded in 2025.
Why it matters: Procurement teams may face delays and renegotiations when vendor usage policies block required military use cases; include acceptable-use exceptions and escalation paths in contracts.
Gives publishers control over inclusion and attribution in Google's AI Overviews to protect referral traffic and transparency.
Why it matters: Publishers can opt out of AI Overviews to help preserve referral traffic and related revenue.
Specification proceedings will set six-month measures to guarantee competitors equal access to Android AI features and anonymized Google Search data.
Why it matters: Android developers gain mandated access to the same OS hardware and software features Google uses, reducing engineering work to match Gemini-like capabilities.
The EU's November 2025 Digital Omnibus delays high-risk AI compliance to align deadlines with standards and simplifies GDPR rules, easing burdens for developers and SMEs while attracting regulatory and parliamentary scrutiny.
Why it matters: IT and compliance teams gain up to 16 months extra for high-risk AI compliance by aligning deadlines with standards rollout, reducing immediate penalty risk.
DOT will use Google Gemini to draft proposed transportation rules in about 20 minutes, speeding rulemaking but raising safety and hallucination concerns.
Why it matters: Require AI verification and human-in-the-loop review to detect hallucinations and ensure legal and safety compliance in faster-issued rules.
Ottawa will introduce separate online harms legislation and may add a 'right to delete' for deepfakes in a privacy bill, forcing platforms to update takedown, provenance, and deletion workflows.
Why it matters: Platforms should prepare for faster takedown SLAs and potential regulator oversight — the 2024 draft included a 24‑hour takedown window for intimate content.
New lawsuits and a creators' campaign target unlicensed use of books and art in model training; upcoming court rulings could define fair use for AI and force licensing or operational changes.
Why it matters: Court rulings could require licenses for core training datasets; allocate budget or face litigation risk.
Singapore’s IMDA issues a model framework for agentic AI, setting accountability and safety guidance as firms report prompt-injection and unauthorized-action risks.
Why it matters: Map and enforce least-privilege for agents: treat agent identities like service accounts and restrict API scopes.
Centralizes U.S. AI policy and authorizes DOJ review of state laws, creating legal uncertainty for rules slated to take effect in January 2026.
Why it matters: Compliance teams should track federal guidance from the Executive Order and pending state rules; conflicting requirements can create immediate legal risk.
A Treasury Committee report published Jan 20, 2026 tells the Financial Conduct Authority to issue comprehensive guidance by end‑2026 clarifying how consumer‑protection and individual‑accountability rules apply to AI in financial services.
Why it matters: Regulatory timeline: The committee expects the FCA to publish guidance by end‑2026 — begin compliance planning now to align resources and timelines.
Creates a federal civil remedy for victims of non‑consensual sexually explicit AI deepfakes and triggers intensified regulatory probes of xAI’s Grok.
Why it matters: Legal risk: The DEFIANCE Act creates a federal civil remedy. Organizations and developers that enable image‑editing pipelines may face new liability if their tools enable non‑consensual explicit content.
As agentic AI gains autonomy and data access, businesses and payments firms are prioritizing execution boundaries, human accountability, and runtime controls to prevent misuse, fraud, and security incidents.
Why it matters: Map agent permissions and limit execution scope now — agents with broad API access increase lateral-movement and fraud risk.
A World Economic Forum report (Jan 19, 2026) shows measurable AI gains across 30+ countries and 20 industries and identifies data foundations, platforms, work redesign, and governance as priorities for scaling.
Why it matters: Prioritize data foundations (quality, metadata, access controls) to enable reliable, reusable AI across products and domains.
EU transparency rules and rising publisher lawsuits force AI teams to prioritize licensed training data and provenance tooling to reduce legal and compliance risk.
Why it matters: Inventory and provenance: ML teams must catalog training-data lineage and retain licensing metadata to meet EU transparency obligations and support audits.
A proposed pause would halt new AI data-center builds while regulators assess energy, environmental and community impacts, but the moratorium has limited congressional support amid industry pushback.
Why it matters: Permitting risk: state and local permitting timelines could lengthen if lawmakers or utilities impose new restrictions or mitigation requirements—plan for potential delays in site approvals.
Sanders proposes pausing new AI data-center construction to study social, environmental and economic impacts, forcing policymakers and IT teams to reassess infrastructure plans amid limited bipartisan support.
Why it matters: A congressional moratorium could slow approvals for hyperscaler campuses and affect cloud and AI capacity planning.
Federal action and a DOJ task force signal a push to centralize AI oversight as state safety and transparency laws take effect.
Why it matters: Map production systems to state obligations now — New York’s RAISE Act took effect Jan. 12, 2026 (Nelson Mullins).
Regulatory probes into xAI’s Grok over sexualized deepfake images raise near-term legal and compliance risks for operators of image-generation models.
Why it matters: Prepare incident-response playbooks for generative AI; regulators have opened formal investigations (Ofcom; California DOJ).
Victims of nonconsensual, sexually explicit AI-generated images would gain a private right to sue creators for damages, shifting enforcement toward civil claims as the bill moves to the House.
Why it matters: Creates a civil damages route so victims can pursue compensation without waiting for criminal charges or platform removal.